Nature  

Forests, oceans, wetlands, grasslands, and deserts

Over one-third of India’s GDP depends on its natural ecosystems, including forests, oceans, wetlands, grasslands, and deserts. However, increasing population density, unsustainable urbanisation, and agricultural expansion, among others, have caused widespread loss of forest cover, degradation of coastal and open natural ecosystems, and immense biodiversity loss. This is adversely affecting the livelihoods, health, and safety of vulnerable communities – undermining India’s progress towards 80% of the SDGs (35 out of 44 of the targets) related to poverty, hunger, health, water, cities, climate, oceans, and land.

India needs climate solutions that restore its natural capital, placing forest and tribal communities, pastoral communities, fishing communities, and women at the centre. These solutions enhance the quality and quantity of India’s carbon sinks (such as natural ecosystems that absorb more carbon from the atmosphere than they release), preserve essential ecosystem services, and secure development co-benefits such as improved livelihoods, preservation of culture, and a better quality of life. Nature also builds adaptive capacity, increasing resilience to severe and unpredictable disasters and climate risks, such as floods, cyclones, droughts, and heatwaves.

Challenge

With its diverse topography, India’s natural ecosystems are essential to its health and economy. Forests and trees cover over 80.9 million hectares in India – nearly 25% of the country’s geographic area. Open natural ecosystems (including naturally open habitats of savannas, scrublands, grasslands, and ravines, with occasional trees) cover approximately 10% of India’s land area, supporting wild livestock and pastoral livelihoods; grasslands alone support 50% of the fodder requirements for the 500 million livestock in India. India’s coastline stretching over 7,500 kilometres is rich with coral reefs and marine biodiversity; the country also has 75 designated Ramsar wetland sites. The carbon sequestration potential of peatlands, wetlands, seagrasses, and mangroves – or ‘blue’ carbon – is much higher than terrestrial ecosystems. This is significant for the climate crisis; mangroves, for example, which cover only 0.15% of India’s geographic area, can sequester four times more carbon dioxide than tropical forests.

However, these natural ecosystems – and the climate, environmental, and socio-economic benefits they provide – are under grave threat from increasing population density, rapid urbanisation, and agricultural expansion. Climate change is also altering marine, terrestrial, freshwater and island ecosystems aggravating species loss and impacting key ecosystem services. Nature is declining globally at unprecedented rates, with 1 million plant and animal species threatened with extinction. In India alone, from 2019 to 2022, over 55,400 hectares of forest area were diverted for non-forest purposes. The country lost nearly 30% of its wetlands in over three decades, across rural and urban areas. While deforestation and ecosystem degradation release carbon dioxide stored in trees and the soil into the atmosphere, contributing to global warming, this also causes several other adverse effects. It increases soil erosion and hastens desertification, contributes to reduced pollination and increases the spread of invasive plant and insect species, aggravates biodiversity loss and species extinction, and disrupts the hydrological cycle. Nature loss also impacts the livelihoods and socio-economic development of communities dependent on natural ecosystems for food, shelter, income, fuel, and their ways of life; for example, approximately 275 million people in rural areas, including forest dwellers and tribal communities, depend on forests for at least a part of their livelihoods. Habitat loss also brings humans and animals in closer contact, increasing the risk of spread of zoonotic or other diseases of probable animal origin like the COVID-19 virus.

Large-scale infrastructure development and urbanisation, and severe natural disasters like cyclones, among other factors, are destroying India’s mangroves and coastal ecosystems, with human activities encroaching upon freshwater ecosystems as well. The indiscriminate dumping of industrial and plastic waste, and resulting toxic pollutants, are causing biodiversity loss, and degrading water and soil quality, with negative consequences for fishing communities and ecosystem health. These factors are compounded by climate risks. For example, ocean acidification and warming are destroying coral reefs and reef-dependent fish species. Stronger tropical storms and floods are destroying mangroves and seagrasses along India’s coastline, reducing natural buffers against climate risks and threatening the survival of seagrass-dependent species such as dugongs. Mangroves, often the first line of defence against cyclones and sea level rise, declined by 40% over the last century due to agriculture, urbanisation, aquaculture, and tourism, among others. Several of India’s islands are also experiencing cyclonic events, sea level rise, and rapid development, threatening endemic biodiversity and island communities.

Open natural ecosystems (ONEs) and deserts are also experiencing degradation, adversely affecting pastoral and nomadic communities. ONEs are increasingly being diverted for land use change, such as renewable energy projects (wind and solar), intensive agriculture, and tree plantations. Unsustainable restoration approaches are further degrading these lands due to misconceptions about grasslands as wastelands or degraded forest land.

With increasing wind velocity in deserts, sand is shifting and engulfing houses, property, and livestock, causing immense losses. Increasing temperatures, landscape degradation, poor watershed management, and erratic rainfall are reducing water availability and exacerbating drought and desertification. Women and girls are disproportionately affected by having to walk long distances to collect or harvest water, due to drudgery and related injuries, as well as increased risk of physical and sexual violence.

While policies exist, there is a lack of long-term commitment for restoring nature, and ongoing efforts are insufficient to meet the country’s carbon sink targets (to create an additional carbon sink of 2.5 to 3 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent through additional forest and tree cover by 2030). Short-term efforts focused on sporadic tree plantations without ensuring place-based ecosystem soundness, enhancement of local livelihoods, and long-term sustainability will lead to unintended consequences. In addition, finance for nature is limited. Public funds form the lion’s share of nature-based financing, with only 17% of total funds coming from the private sector globally.

Solution

Capture and store carbon dioxide
from the atmosphere
Provide ecosystem services for
humans and biodiversity
Build resilience to climate risks
and disasters

Range of responses 

Forest ecosystem responses apply to terrestrial forests and trees outside forests. These include efforts to protect, restore, and manage forests, while developing sustainable livelihoods for local communities, sequestering carbon dioxide, and building resilience to disaster risk including heat stress.
Community-based forest responses place local communities as key stakeholders in forest management, given their understanding of the local context and dependence on forest resources. Responses are focused on enhancing the health of forest ecosystems, including measures to help forest regeneration. Examples include:

  • Avoiding deforestation, by encouraging alternative energy sources to reduce pressure from demand for biomass or firewood;
  • Managing the spread of invasive plant species (like Lantana camara) and insect species;
  • Conserving biodiversity hotspots;
  • Supporting seed collection and storage to preserve genetic diversity, and assisted migration of species threatened by climate change;
  • Enhancing genetic diversity of plant and animal species, and planting native, climate-resilient trees;
  • Creating hi-tech nurseries for quality tree saplings;
  • Supporting community-led monitoring of forest ecosystems, through forest committees;
  • Preserving local and indigenous knowledge about forest management and integrating such knowledge with community and local government-level action plans.
Forest-based livelihood responses increase incomes, secure forest produce, and strengthen the forest economy for communities living in and around these areas. These include:

  • Skilling and renewable energy-powered machinery for processing of non-timber forest products under sustainable forest livelihood models, like a climate-smart forest economy;
  • Innovative market linkages for value-added products from tree-based, bamboo-based, and other nature-based enterprises;
  • Developing People’s Biodiversity Registers, with comprehensive information on locally available bio-resources.
Disaster risk reduction responses in forests mitigate the risk of wildfires, reduce heat stress, improve flood control, and protect biodiversity and forest-dependent communities. These include:

  • Improved fire management through vulnerability mapping, and creating fire breaks (or small clearings of ditches) to slow or stop fire progress;
  • Forest restoration in flood-prone areas to increase water retention and reduce run-off;
  • Creating green corridors, peri-urban forests and urban gardens in non-forest areas, such as cities, to reduce heat waves and the urban heat island effect.
Coastal and freshwater ecosystem responses apply to mangroves, sea grasses, coral reefs, salt marshes, riverine systems, lakes, ponds, etc., and include restoration and disaster risk reduction, with benefits for low-income coastal communities, and those living around water bodies.
Area-based conservation or restoration responses can enhance ‘blue’ carbon sinks (key to climate change mitigation) and secure ecosystem services such as preventing erosion, regulating water and air quality, recycling nutrients, and establishing biodiversity habitats. These include:

  • Restoring or maintaining protected wetland areas and mangrove forests;
  • Restoring lakes and ponds, and adopting constructed wetlands systems or floating wetlands to support restoration;
  • Restoring vegetation along riverbanks and around ponds to provide buffers against soil erosion and eutrophication caused by nutrient runoff;
  • Restoring degraded seagrass sites by transplanting seagrass sprigs, with the help of naturally degradable bamboo and coconut rope frames, for example;
  • Instituting community-based payment for ecosystem services (PES) to support restoration of dwindling freshwater sources;
  • Preserving local and indigenous knowledge about mangrove/marine ecosystem management and integrating such knowledge with community and local government-level action plans;
  • Supporting community-based monitoring committees or initiatives to identify risks to natural ecosystems, by tracking changes in sentinel species.
Disaster risk reduction responses in densely populated low-lying coastal regions can also enhance buffers for ecosystems and communities by weakening storm surges, reducing wave energy, interrupting rising sea water, reducing salinity ingress, and supporting flood control. These include:

  • Creating bio-shields along coastlines, by planting mangroves in the sea front and other water-resistant or water-thirsty trees in low tidal zones;
  • Conserving and regenerating coral reefs, through coral garden nurseries or micro-fragmentation;
  • Restoring wetlands and coastal marshes and protecting barrier islands.
Open natural ecosystem responses are conservation and landscape management efforts that decrease nature loss, increase biodiversity, and secure pastoral livelihoods.
In grasslands, responses include:

  • Adaptive management of alien invasive species such as Lantana camara and Prosopsis juliflora;
  • Avoiding planting unsuitable trees or grasses and renewable energy installations on the assumption that these are wastelands;
  • Region-specific research on the kinds of plant composition needed to increase biodiversity and protect the soil.
Desert ecosystem responses focus on improving access to water for water-stressed communities to secure community health and reduce drudgery. They also protect and restore degraded land and natural vegetation to stabilise the ecosystem.
These include:

  • Restoring naturally occurring reservoirs or ponds in deserts, such as naadis and khadeens, through desilting, repairing breaches in embankments, or plantation to reduce soil erosion;
  • Restoring traditional artificial water harvesting structures, including taankas;
  • Increasing natural water storage mechanisms like sand dams in rivers in rural areas, to recharge groundwater;
  • Restoring and conserving common lands, such as orans or sacred groves in Rajasthan;
  • Stabilising sand dunes, through different types of fences that protect vegetation from grazing or harvesting, establishment of micro-wind breaks, and afforestation;
  • Preventing overgrazing by livestock in degraded lands.
Cross-cutting responses, including data, technology, livelihood, and capacity building responses, provide benefits across natural ecosystems.
Data and technological responses include relevant research and deployment of technology to monitor ecosystems and support implementation across natural ecosystems. These include:

  • Predictive analytics and machine learning models to support restoration efforts;
  • Artificial intelligence solutions for monitoring tree cover, plantations, and land use; prediction of wildfires and vulnerability mapping, etc.;
  • Remote sensing tools to monitor the health of coastal ecosystems and mangroves;
  • Data that identifies sustainable nature-based solutions in the form of scientific guides to support restoration efforts across ecosystems, like the World Resources Institute’s Restoration Opportunities Atlas for India (for example, data is not yet available on Himalayan peatland assessment for carbon or for wetland categories);
  • R&D and policy engagement to explore nascent solutions, such as seaweed cultivation (which has the potential to capture carbon, improve human nutrition, and reduce methane emissions by adding to cattle feed), developing alternate seaweed-based livelihoods, and industrial uses.
Livelihood and capacity building responses support communities in creating and maintaining environment-friendly and climate-aligned jobs. These include:

  • Creating opportunities for community-based eco-tourism, such as zero-emissions trails and sustainable homestays, and providing requisite skilling and capacity building for local communities to run these enterprises;
  • Building community awareness through education about climate change and related environment and climate impacts on vulnerable ecosystems (in vernacular languages as well);
  • Skilling communities in Ecologically Sensitive Areas through innovative livelihood models that are climate-aligned, such as Wildlife Conservation Trust’s water heater of hope or using invasive plant species to create wood polymer composites with diverse applications;
  • Creating roadmaps for ecosystem restoration across hotspots, such as for ecosystem-based adaptation in Maharashtra.

Target groups

Forest-dependent communities and tribal communities in degraded forest lands in Central and Northeast India
Women in forest fringe areas 
Rural Himalayan communities affected by forest fires 
Desert communities in the Thar desert 
Tribal communities in the Western Ghats 
Fishing communities along India’s coasts 
Vulnerable communities residing in India’s islands 
Pastoralists in grasslands and other open natural ecosystems

UN Sustainable Development Goals

Key considerations

Tailor climate solutions to specific geographies and needs

Solutions must be context-specific, and projects must be designed and implemented in response to identified challenges and needs of the community. These must account for the aspirations of the local community. Further, solutions must also capture metrics that can show a biodiversity net gain, such as improvement in a species in a certain area of land or water. Any solution that involves technology must be tailored to the specific geography and should not be implemented without the transfer of adequate knowledge and capacity building.

Enhance long-term sustainability of climate solutions

Solutions must account for long-term sustainability, by way of skilling, enterprise, value chains, and making digital tools available and accessible, such as low-cost satellite data using remote sensing technology like LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging). Further, if a solution involves training or capacity building, the initiative should not end at that stage; a clear incentive needs to be in place for stakeholders to continue engaging in these activities, such as strengthening collectives, developing market linkages for sustainable produce, and ensuring community ownership-based implementation models for the solution to be viable in the long-term. Local communities must also be incentivised to take ownership of efforts to explore and support peer to peer verification between forest committees of two or more regions, to bring down operation costs, and ensure continued monitoring of the project (such as ensuring high survivability of species in restoration projects).

Respect cultural, ecological, and legal rights

Traditional or indigenous knowledge of the local community must be taken into consideration when designing and implementing solutions. Community rights and ownership over forest land should be respected, through processes such as Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC). Considerations regarding competing land use (specifically when planting trees outside forests) must be accounted for; consent of the community and/or the local government (for protected areas) is essential in these cases. Further, implementing organisations must ensure that community-based eco-tourism efforts result in fair and equitable benefit sharing of common eco-tourism revenues.

Combine strategies for holistic climate solutions

Nature-based solutions may need to be paired with other adaptation strategies to reduce disaster risk. For example, implementing organisations should not overestimate the protection that mangrove conservation and restoration provide in the context of sea level rise or cyclonic storms; communities also need the option of relocating their settlements to higher ground or further inland when faced with severe risks.

Prevent greenwashing and other unintended consequences

Solutions should not be implemented without a scientific ecosystem-based roadmap. Without geography-specific insights, large-scale and short-term restoration or tree plantation projects, for example, can be unsustainable if they introduce alien invasive species and further aggravate soil degradation, water stress, and biodiversity loss. Instead, climate-aligned and genetically diverse native plant species should be prioritised; nurseries can be set up to provide high-quality native saplings. Further, while nature-based solutions can make an important contribution to reaching net-zero emissions, they should not be considered as an alternative to or substitute for decarbonisation efforts and must supplement emissions reduction efforts.

Nature - Projects