Farms  

Agriculture, livestock and poultry, fisheries and forests

The agriculture and allied activities sector, including livestock, poultry, fish, and forest produce, is the primary source of livelihoods for nearly half of India’s population. The sector is highly vulnerable to climate change due to its dependence on stable climatic and environmental conditions, such as soil health, moderate temperatures, water availability, and more. Further, agriculture contributes around 14% of India’s total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, primarily due to methane from livestock emissions and rice cultivation and nitrous oxide from manure management and synthetic fertilisers.

This sector needs innovative, inclusive climate-smart solutions that place farming communities – especially small and marginal farmers, women, and farmers belonging to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes – at the centre. These solutions build resilience to climate risks, secure development co-benefits like increased incomes and nutrition security, and reduce the sector’s GHG emissions.

Challenge

Growing at an average rate of 4.6% over the last six years, agriculture in India has become cereal-centric and, as a result, regionally biased and input-intensive. It is characterised by fragmented landholdings and subsistence farming; over 85% of India’s farmland is owned by small and marginal farmers, with less than 2 hectares of land each. With limited purchasing power, they can only increase productivity through crop intensification and diversification. Modern agricultural practices have also pushed farmers further into crisis; with increased costs due to chemical inputs, nutrition insecurity and reduced productivity of land due to monoculture plantations and cash crops, and water stress fuelled by groundwater extraction. With limited access to formal credit (and lack of protections for informal credit), farmers are trapped in a vicious cycle of poverty, with low returns, low savings, low investment, and, again, low returns. This often leads to large-scale migration in search of better work opportunities, which exposes them to additional risks.

The informal nature of the sector and high indebtedness are compounded by increasingly severe and unpredictable climate risks like heat waves, droughts, floods, saline intrusion, and an erratic monsoon. From 2015 to 2022, for example, approximately 33.9 million hectares of crop area were affected due to floods and excessive rains alone (approximately 17% of gross cropped area in the country). It is projected that under an extreme scenario of 2.5°C to 4.9°C temperature rise, rice yields will drop by 32-40% and wheat yields by 41-52%; with projected economic losses of 1.8-3.4% of India’s GDP by 2050. Further, higher temperatures likely also increase irrigation demand, increasing water stress. In the absence of any adaptation measures, climate change could decrease average farm incomes by 15%, and by up to 25% in unirrigated areas, by 2100. Despite having contributed very little to climate change, small and marginal farmers, landless agricultural workers, and tribal farmers are the most vulnerable. Women farmers are also particularly vulnerable, given their limited ability to migrate when faced with risks.

Climate change also has direct and indirect effects on allied sectors. Livestock health is impacted by increased incidence of pests and infectious diseases, and reduced availability of food and water. In 2022, extreme temperatures, in particular heat stress, caused loss of appetite and higher body temperature in milch animals, reducing milk yield by up to 15%; heat stress also reduced egg production. Small-scale fisheries face greater unpredictability in fishing days due to erratic monsoons and increased cyclonic activity; sea level rise also poses a threat to their coastal villages. In parallel, there is a decrease in the availability of commercial fish species due to overfishing, pollution, and climate impacts like rapid warming of waters and ocean acidification that cause changes in ocean ecosystems.

Solution

Climate-smart agriculture is an integrated approach to managing landscapes— agriculture, livestock and poultry, fisheries, and forests — that addresses the interlinked challenges of food security and accelerating climate change. It aims to tackle three main objectives:

Sustainably increase agricultural
productivity and incomes
Adapt and build resilience to
climate change
Reduce greenhouse gas emissions
where possible

Range of responses 

Climate-friendly agriculture responses are divided into the following categories: pre-harvest, post-harvest, and livelihood diversification. 
Pre-harvest responses include:

  • Reducing synthetic inputs that are costly and release GHG emissions, and substituting with bio-inputs that are more affordable and can be produced locally;
  • Integrating trees into farming and livestock systems (agroforestry and animal agroforestry) to improve soil health, reduce soil erosion, and develop alternate income streams from fruit, timber, and biomass produce;
  • Using drought-resilient or indigenous seeds;
  • Adopting system of rice intensification (SRI) to reduce water use and methane emissions;
  • Adopting technological responses like solar-based drip irrigation to increase productivity while limiting water and fossil fuel-based energy use.
Holistic pre-harvest responses can serve dual purposes: enhancing resilience to climate shocks (adaptation) and reducing emissions from agriculture (mitigation). Resilience can be measured through social and ecological outcomes like enhanced profitability from lower input costs and additional income streams, which create a buffer in case of adverse events; nutrition security; and improved soil health and water availability. Mitigation, on the other hand, can include direct measures to reduce emissions, such as SRI or minimising synthetic inputs, or measures to pull carbon out of the atmosphere like sequestration. Agroecological practices like natural farming have the potential to regenerate the soil, and some studies have shown that this increases the ability of soil to capture carbon; however, the effectiveness and replicability is still being assessed at scale. Agroforestry systems, such as bamboo-based agroforestry, have been shown to effectively capture carbon, while restoring degraded land and safeguarding biodiversity. Beyond farming practices, technology and data responses can address climate risks and support robust agricultural systems. For example, satellite or geospatial data (GIS modelling) and artificial intelligence can be used to predict crop yields, measure soil moisture, improve watershed management, provide specific crop advisory and weather alerts, and enable precision farming. In addition, crop insurance can be a useful tool, but has shown limited success with small and marginal farmers so far. This is because it is not universally applicable across crop types, among other issues; hence, innovative models of crop insurance, such as bundling insurance, is an important next step.
Post-harvest responses include:

  • Renewable energy (RE)-powered shellers for crops like maize to reduce labour intensity;
  • Solar-powered dryers that dry fruits, vegetables, and crops for preservation;
  • Decentralised RE-powered cold storage units to reduce spoilage;
  • RE-powered grain and spice processing;
  • Crop residue management to prevent stubble burning;
  • Efficient market linkages for diverse produce.
Post-harvest responses can avoid emissions generated by fossil fuel (typically diesel) powered machinery. They also reduce food losses due to poor supply chain infrastructure for harvesting, storage, and transportation, thereby reducing emissions generated by waste, and increase farmer incomes.
Livelihood diversification responses diversify farmers’ sources of incomes in the following ways:

  • On-farm (crop diversification, animal husbandry, etc.)
  • Off-farm (collection of non-timber forest products, value addition/processing, etc.)
  • Non-farm (skilled labour, rural manufacturing enterprises, etc.)
By offering additional income from different sources, these responses distribute risk and decrease farming households’ vulnerabilities to climate-induced extreme weather and unpredictable monsoons.
Livestock management responses safeguard animal health, improve methane management, and increase efficient land use.
Livestock are vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, particularly heat stress and severe drought. To safeguard animal health, responses must ensure protection against extreme temperatures, a rise in infectious diseases (for example, the lumpy skin disease outbreak of 2022), natural disasters, and a reduction in food and water availability. These include:
  • Effective shade structures;
  • Adapting grazing schedules to extreme temperatures;
  • Investing in disease surveillance and vaccinations;
  • Nutritional strategies such as increasing water availability, nutrient and energy density in diets, and supplementation of electrolytes;
  • Low-cost natural ventilation systems for animal housing, such as installing foggers, fans, and giving timely water baths;
  • Animal insurance at nominal charges that provide contingency support.
While livestock are important assets for vulnerable communities, they are also associated with methane emissions – thus methane management through feed additives or substitutes is recommended. In addition, the use of low-emissions technologies in food processing and management, for cheese, milk, meat, etc., can increase incomes from livestock management.

Efficient land use responses avoid deforestation and improve carbon sinks through:

Climate-smart fisheries and aquaculture responses have an important role to play in sustainably feeding our growing population, as they provide quality, affordable, and accessible nutrition to vulnerable communities. 
Responses for small-scale coastal fisheries can build resilience to climate risks through:
  • Effective early warning systems to reduce disaster risk at sea and make coastal communities more climate resilient;
  • Safety-at-sea training for fishers faced with weather uncertainties;
  • Increased access to marine insurance;
  • Innovations like RE-powered fishing boats;
  • Incentivising self-support groups to share local knowledge, resources, gear, and incomes, and improve preparedness;
  • Easy access to basic infrastructure, such as timely availability of ice and tech-based market linkages;
  • Non-environment-related income-producing activities that diversify livelihoods and reduce fishers’ dependence on the sea.
Responses for inland fisheries include both capture fisheries (from freshwater sources like lakes, rivers, and ponds) and aquaculture (breeding, raising, and harvesting fish, shellfish, and aquatic plants). Some examples of responses are:
  • Shifting to fish species that favourably adapt to water stress and warmer temperatures in drought-prone regions;
  • Promoting integration of aquaculture with other farm systems;
  • Suitable site selection and risk assessment for aquaculture farms through geospatial data models (GIS modelling);
  • Making changes to the feeding formulations and regimes of fish when faced with temperature changes.

Target groups

Small and marginal farmers
Women farmers
Small scale coastal and inland fisheries 
Tribal communities

UN Sustainable Development Goals

Key considerations

Tailor climate solutions to specific geographies and needs

India is highly biodiverse, with 20 different agroecological zones that have a variety of different factors at play, including their own soil type, microclimate, seed varieties, and irrigation patterns. There is a significant need to fill data gaps about what responses are best suited to which geographies, based on their biodiversity. To be successful, agricultural responses must be local, context-specific, and place-based; for example, agroforestry projects in the Himalayan regions and the hot and humid coastal regions need to be implemented differently.

Further, given the economic vulnerability of these beneficiaries, technological solutions must account for accessibility and affordability within target communities, to ensure their uptake and effectiveness.

Cover climate transition risks and address maladaptation

Pre-emptively mapping and addressing unintended consequences, in dialogue with local communities, builds more effective programmes in the long run. For example, solar-powered water pumps are not recommended in water-stressed areas, unless their implementation is layered with a water rejuvenation programme. In addition, large-scale transitions in agriculture often require an enabling ecosystem to ensure their success – for example, local availability of bio-inputs, market linkages, and advisory support – with significant repercussions if not accounted for. Supporting mechanisms are critical for farmers transitioning to non-chemical agriculture, especially to address any potential decline in yields and farmer incomes during the first few years.  

Institutionalise climate thinking and planning 

It is important to co-create climate solutions with local communities to ensure that the solutions are relevant to their context and sustainable in the long term. Providing clear incentives and supporting frameworks can enable continued engagement with climate-resilient agricultural practices, even after the programme elapses. This can be done in diverse ways, by strengthening farmer institutions like Farmers Producers Organisations (FPOs) and fisheries cooperatives, developing market linkages to increase profitability, or designing community ownership-based implementation models – where the community/FPOs also share costs across the supply chain. 

Farms - Projects